ABSTRACT
Environment pollution of different dimension has caused a lot of havocs to the health and wealth of some Nigerians. To this end, the study examines the array of legislation that provides for various remedies for victims of pollution in Nigeria. The study also analyzed various case laws their adequacy or otherwise. The study further investigates the mechanism for the enforcement of the claims by the victims of pollution in Nigeria. The general background of the study examines the research problem, which ascertain the adequacy of these laws or otherwise. The objectives are to among others identify these remedies. It also state the justification, the significance, of this scope the study and the methodology of this research is doctrinal. The study evaluates the criminal remedies especially in relation to the fact that most of the statutes are laced with penal provisions inform of fines and terms of improvement. The study also focus on the civil remedies in form of compensation, damages, restoration/rehabilitation and injunction. Similarly, the mechanism for the enforcement of the claims by the victims of pollution such as litigation which is plagued with series of problems such that victims often seek remedies under law of tort, thus they are unable to prove their case before the courts. The study also examines Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) viz: negotiation, mediation, conciliation and arbitration as a tool for enforcement. The study concludes with some findings which includes inter alia absence of express constitutional provision on pollution scattered legislations on pollution which as mostly penal the penalties are paltry sum and problem of jurisdiction vested in the High Court by some Acts which is in conflict with the constitutional provisions that vest same exclusively in the Federal High Court.

CHAPTER ONE GENERAL INTRODUCTION

       Historical Background

Before the advent of British rule, communities in present day Nigeria utilized customary methods in the settlement of environmental disputes. Thus, the management of the environment in most Nigerian communities is based on customary law concept where this has been modified or repealed by statute. The number of customary laws may be as many as the number of ethnic-groups. There are about 300 ethnic groups in Nigeria.¹ Thus in the same state or among the same tribe there exist numerous customary laws.² The various customs of different ethnic groups and communities in Nigeria contain remedies for environmental pollution. For example, in the Iroko community bush burning under customary law is prohibited. A violation of this law will lead to the arrest of the offender who is taken before the village head who imposes fine on the offender.³ Bush burning has a negative effect on the environment as it pollutes the air, and the fire spreads uncontrollable and on several instances destroyed large areas of land and also causes serious damage to other valuables. For example, in the case of Busari Adediga V. Abati.⁴ The plaintiff wrote the defendant requesting that he be informed when the defendant would set fire to his farm to enable the plaintiff protect his property. The defendant claimed to have informed the plaintiff although the plaintiff denied
defendant set fire to him farm and went fishing while the farm was burning. The fire went out of control and destroyed the plaintiff’s farm. The customary court held that although bush burning is an acceptable customary practice, the defendant was liable for damage to the plaintiff‟s property.
Similarly, among the Egbas there exists customary law governing the general use of the stream and pollution. This practice, Adewale⁵ opined is uniform to some extent amongst various communities and state further that it is also the general practice in the eastern part of Nigeria. Customary law in most part of Nigeria prohibits trespassing, for example, in the north where Nomads move from one place to another for the purpose of grazing their animals. Often animals trespass into farm land and victims claim damages arising from their act⁶. These customary laws of various communities have been enforced long before the advent of colonial rule. Thus Amokaye⁷ refers to this period as the first stage of development of environmental law in Nigeria.
The introduction of common law principles and statutory laws by the colonial administration to regulate pollution activities marked the beginning of the second era. Under the common law principles, which forms part of Nigerian legal system it provides means for the institution of legal action for pollution under spheres of nuisance, negligence, trespass to land and the rule in Rylands v. Fletcher⁸. It should be noted that, nuisance are two types, private and public nuisance which by definition is said to be: